Given what little I know about what’s going on, that’s basically my view of it as well. On the one hand, Israel is responding to an untenable security situation — Hamas rockets being fired into neighborhoods and cities — that we wouldn’t tolerate for a second. (In fact, we invaded Iraq on a much flimsier security pretext.) Still, it’s hard to shake the feeling that Israel is trying to run the table right here right now, in the twilight moments of the Dubya presidency, because they know they have carte blanche from 43 to do what they will. And I suspect this particular neocon-run advance, like all the rest of ’em in recent years, is doomed to failure — if anything, I’d wager, it’s just swelling the ranks (and the coffers) of Hamas.
Regardless, the Obama administration and Secretary of State Clinton are going to have their work cut out for them. I’m not one who believes particularly that conflicts with roots in millennia-long religious strife can get “solved” in one or two US presidential terms. But let’s at least hope, under their watch, we can start to achieve the type of broader range of discussion about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that you can find in…say, Israel. It’s both embarrassing and extremely counterproductive for our nation to be seen — and to continually be used — as a knee-jerk diplomatic dupe that will always blindly support policies initiated by the most conservative factions in Israeli politics.
Thanks for the props, Kevin.
I don’t think that presenting the Israel-Palestine conflict as being millennia-old helps us figure out how to deal with the situation, which really developed in the 20th century. This seems to be a familiar trope in the US conversation, which falls back on “oh, they’ve been fighting forever” when it’s not actively demonizing Palestinians.
By the way, that’s not meant to suggest in any way that you yourself were demonizing Palestinians. Rather, it’s that the closest we ever seem to get to “balance” on this issue in the US, particularly in the media, is to cast it as a sort of ancient Hatfields/McCoys feud where “both sides” are to blame. And I think this sort of illusion of proportionality is not helpful.