The friendly neighborhood trailer for Spiderman 2, soon to sling in on the coattails of RotK, shows up online. I didn’t much care for the long set-up, but Alfred Molina seems pitch-perfect as Doc Ock.
Tag: Cinema
Two (Towers)…
Reelviews: “There can be no greater gift for a movie lover than the one bestowed upon audiences by Peter Jackson, whose The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King is not only the best movie of 2003, but the crowning cinematic achievement of the past several years. In fact, labeling this as a “movie” is almost an injustice. This is an experience of epic scope and grandeur, amazing emotional power, and relentless momentum…Not only is this motion picture an entirely worthy conclusion to the landmark trilogy, but it’s better than its predecessors.” Mori at AICN: “[T]hese films represent a high point for genre filmmaking that will be nearly impossible to equal or surpass…It’s overwhelming. It’s incredibly powerful, with battle sequences that will sweep over you like virtual reality and emotional crescendos that would be impossible to hit in a single film.“
Three (Hunters)…
The Daily Mail: “How about amazing, stupendous, jawdropping and overwhelming? For this is wonderfully imaginative cinema on the grandest possible scale…There are sights here unparalleled in cinema…For its scale, imagination and passion, this is, without doubt, the greatest cinematic trilogy ever.” Financial Times: “This concluding film may be the greatest fantasy- adventure epic ever made. It is almost certainly the most spectacular.” Harry at AICN: “This is frankly one of the greatest films ever made…for me, it is without equal or parallel. It does not diminish the others to any degree, it is just what it is — perfect. Like when Lean did BRIDGE OF THE RIVER KWAI, LAWRENCE OF ARABIA and DR ZHIVAGO — there was just fate leaning over the shoulder and perfection was achieved.” Wow, after all that superlative madness (which, ok, we expected from Harry), how bout a new commercial? Beware: this one’s a money-shot trailer…there’s a very good chance you might not want to see some of this stuff until after Tuesday. Then again, maybe you do…
Four (Hobbits)…
BBC: “The Return of the King brings an overwhelming air of expectation and of consequence – and in almost every sense it dwarfs what has come before…This three-hour, 11-minute epic is an unqualified triumph, one that raises the bar for any spectacle-respecting director of the future. The Oscar, surely, must go to Peter Jackson.” CTV: “Are there enough M words to describe Lord of the Rings: Return of the King? Majestic, monumental, magnificent.” Times Online: “AND so it ends, the greatest film trilogy ever mounted, with some of the most amazing action sequences committed to celluloid. The Return of the King is everything a Ring fan could possibly wish for, and much more.“
Five…
Lisa Schwarzbaum of Entertainment Weekly: “All hail The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King! I can’t think of another film trilogy that ends in such glory, or another monumental work of sustained storytelling that surges ahead with so much inventiveness and ardor. The conclusion of Peter Jackson’s masterwork is passionate and literate, detailed and expansive, and it’s conceived with a risk-taking flair for old-fashioned movie magic at its most precious.” And, we’ve got another clip! Gollum connives above Minas Morgul…relatively spoilerish. (If you do watch it, notice how he licks his lips. It’s amazing CGI.)
From Dawson’s Creek to Wayne Manor.
Christopher Nolan and David Goyer think about adding Katie Holmes to the new Batman. (Early word was she might play Talia, daughter of Ras al Ghul, but it sounds like she’s just the love interest.) I’m not sure if she and Bale work together, but hopefully the romance will remain a relatively minor subplot anyway. Update: Viggo as Ras Al Ghul?
Six…
Stuff.NZ: “It is now possible to view the three films as one movie, and the three combined are a spectacular triumph. The devotion of cast and crew to Tolkien’s work shines through, and through their dedication movie history has been made.” UK Mirror: “[Peter Jackson’s] challenge was to make it bigger, better and more spectacular than the first two – and, hobbit-like, he has triumphantly succeeded against all the odds.” Courier-Mail (SPOILERS): ” It unfolds with the majesty and power of all great movie experiences. The result is we have an epic that sets a new benchmark for battle sequences…”
Seven…
TIME: “Here is an epic with literature’s depth and opera’s splendor — and one that could be achieved only in movies. What could be more terrific?…three huge installments, one supreme enthrallment. Ecstasy trumps exhaustion in the reliving of a great human quest, a cinematic triumph.” Also, an interview with PJ on Christopher Lee and the EEs, and an all-new clip! This one’s more spoilerific than the nine-minute batch of a few days ago (it’s an event early in the film), so you may just want to keep away.
Risky Business.
An angry and confused American man, disgusted by the valuelessness, rapacity, and interminable selfishness that he believes characterizes the United States in the throes of unfettered capitalism, finds meaning and community overseas in an antimodern movement dedicated to tradition, discipline, martialism, and fighting Westernization. Taking arms against the side his mother country supports, this scruffy, bearded fellow watches proudly as his comrades-in-arms attempt to achieve honor and purity through a wave of suicide attacks against superior American-backed firepower. The John Walker Lindh story? Nope, The Last Samurai. Funny how the same narrative looks completely different once Tom Cruise gets involved.
Ok, ok, I should say that The Last Samurai is both very well-made and for the most part very enjoyable. Despite having the straightest teeth in the nineteenth century, Cruise is quite good in the lead (give or take the first five minutes — somebody should have already figured out by now that, after Jerry Maguire and Vanilla Sky, Cruise should never, ever, play a drunk.) Moreover, Ken Watanabe in the semi-fictional title role is a revelation — he commands the screen’s attention and suggests comparison with some of Kurosawa’s stars of yesteryear. There’s tons of solid supporting performances here, particularly by the residents of Katsumoto’s village. The cinematography and the New Zealand scenery (while obviously recalling Middle Earth) are often beautiful, and the action scenes (if not the CGI) are first-rate. And, there’s ninjas in it, and, let’s face it, that’s pretty cool.
But, still, something about the film ultimately left me hollow, and it wasn’t just the drawn-out, increasingly Hollywood-y ending. In some ways, the movie seemed like a textbook-case fictionalization of T.J. Jackson Lears’ No Place of Grace: An American seeks meaning and refuge from the vicissitudes of Gilded Age capitalism in the antimodern, the martial, and the Orient. So, in that sense, the history checks out.
But, as Louis Menand’s The Metaphysical Club points out, many – if not most – Americans who’d fought in the Civil War had soured on the purported romance of dying for a cause (In fact, Menand argues, perhaps a bit dubiously, that it is this realization, borne of Antietam and Cold Harbor, that undergirds the philosophy of pragmatism.) And you’d think that after the carnage of Pickett’s charge and Petersburg, most Civil War veterans — particularly ones as disillusioned as Tom Cruise’s Algren — wouldn’t think charging a Howitzer is a particularly valiant way to go out. (Although I haven’t read the book, I expect Cold Mountain to make some hay of this come Christmas Day.) Besides, c’mon y’all, didn’t we learn anything from WWI?
I know, I know, I’m probably thinking about this way too much. After all, the “fight to the last man in the name of the cause” suicide charge is a staple of both samurai films and war movies (including Edward Zwick’s own Glory), and The Last Samurai is both a very good war movie and a superlative samurai flick. And, of course we’re going to see a few variations on this trope next week in RotK, a film I was lavishly anticipating just one entry ago — in fact, change the costumes a bit and we’ve got the Ride of the Rohirrim here.
But…riding against Sauron is one thing — riding against the United States is (hopefully) another. (For that matter, while they both embrace the antimodern, I’d say the overarching theme of LotR is fighting so your friends can live, not fighting for the sake of dying with honor.) I suppose it’s probably good for a lot of people’s sense of perspective to see an American-made Alamo-type story where the US are the imperialist heavies rather than the freedom fighters (even if nobody seems to be taking it as such.) Still, something about the naked adoration this film displays for its suicidal warriors against Western modernity struck a discordant tone with me.
In short, I thought the movie goes only half the distance — it makes the West morally ambiguous without doing anything but idolizing the martialistic, traditionalist, and antimodern culture of the samurai. In our time, when the clash between antimodernism and the West seems more pertinent than ever, you’d think a movie like this one wouldn’t find so much to relish about suicide charges against American values. And, while Western modernity undoubtedly has a lot to answer for in Japan, there has to be some sort of irony to the fact that US audiences thrilled to the final scene in the Emperor’s chambers on the same weekend as the 62nd anniversary of Pearl Harbor. Be careful singing the praises of anti-Western martialism, because it may just come back to bite ya.
But, in case you get the wrong idea from my post here, the film is definitely worth seeing. If you see only one movie about Americans in Japan this year, see Lost in Translation. But I’d check this out before Kill Bill. And, in case I didn’t make it clear before, this film’s got ninjas, y’all, ninjas.
8 Days…
but who’s counting? Variety: “A ‘King’ that earns its crown, Peter Jackson’s final installment in his monumental ‘The Lord of the Rings’ represents that filmmaking rarity — a third part of a trilogy that is decisively the best of the lot.” Hollywood Reporter: “Sure to be an Oscar contender in many categories and a breathtaking argument for director Peter Jackson winning every award there is to give, ‘King’ has none of the usual deficiencies that frequently scuttle third films.” New Zealand Herald: “We come to it at last, the great film of our time. The film which makes the heart leap, the tears flow, the adrenaline race like never before…Peter Jackson and his crew have saved the best and the boldest for last.” I don’t get it…what is it exactly you’re trying to tell me?