Undone by The Great Eye.

Have we inadvertently killed Schrodinger’s cat? No, it’s much, much worse. Cosmologists at Case Western Reserve and Vanderbilt speculate that mankind may have hastened the end of the universe by observing dark energy in 1998. “[Q]uantum theory says that whenever we observe or measure something, we could stop it decaying due what is what is called the ‘quantum Zeno effect,’ which suggests that if an ‘observer’ makes repeated, quick observations of a microscopic object undergoing change, the object can stop changing – just as a watched kettle never boils…Prof Krauss says that the measurement of the light from supernovae in 1998, which provided evidence of dark energy, may have reset the decay of the void to zero — back to a point when the likelihood of its surviving was falling rapidly. ‘In short, we may have snatched away the possibility of long-term survival for our universe and made it more likely it will decay,’ says Prof Krauss.” D’oh! But wouldn’t this presume that at no other place or time in our unfathomably gigantic universe did any other civilization make the same observations? Given the odds of intelligent life out there, that seems unlikely. (And, if you think this all sounds goofy and ridiculous, just wait until we get to the multiverse…)

Life in the So-Called Space Age.

“If the current proposals to restart human exploration fail politically, indeed, the human space flight endeavor conducted under government auspices might well lose its momentum. I obviously hope that doesn’t happen. But it’s far from a slam dunk that we’re going back to the Moon and on to Mars.” Two companion pieces to today’s reflection on 50 years of Sputnik which I missed earlier: The Grey Lady hypothesizes about the next fifty years of space travel (suggesting its future as a public enterprise might be dubious) and takes a moment to consider the pop culture ramifications of the space age. “‘At the level of government, I think we’re still struggling as to why we’re sending people to space,’ Dr. Logsdon said. ‘It’s a decent question, and I think it’s an unanswered question.’” (My answer to this question, for what it’s worth, is here.)

Hawking Swoops and Soars.

“I have long wanted to go into space, and the zero-gravity flight is the first step toward space travel.” Physicist Stephen Hawking experiences zero gravity aboard the Vomit Comet. “Hawking said he hoped his flight would provide a boost for commercial spaceflight, in line with his oft-expressed belief that humanity’s future depended on moving beyond Earth…’I think that getting a portion of the human race permanently off the planet is imperative for our future as a species. It will be difficult to do this with the slow, expensive and risk-averse nature of government space programs,’ Hawking said, working in a veiled reference to NASA. ‘We need to engage the entrepreneurial engine that has reduced the cost of everything from airline tickets to personal computers.‘” I’m in full agreement…far be it from me to differ with a man as intelligent, knowledgeable, and solid on the mic as Mr. Hawking.

Water, Water Everywhere?

A faraway Jupiter-like gas planet, HD 209458b, is found (by some) to have water in its atmosphere. I saw this on Blivet on Friday and spent the weekend dreaming about it: If my sleeping brain can be trusted, HD 209458b has winged, eel-like space reptiles cavorting amidst the gaseous clouds there. Alas, my subconscious makes for a lousy exobiologist: “[A] Jupiter-like gaseous planet such as this one, as opposed to a rocky one like Earth, is highly unlikely to harbour any kind of life.” Well, damn.

Moon Station Zebra.

In “world of the future” news, NASA announces it plans to establish a permanently-staffed base camp on the moon by 2024, preferably at one of its poles. (Here’s the rationale.) A moonbase within 18 years? I’m all for it…just keep an eye out for monoliths and make sure Sean Connery runs a tight ship.